A week is 168 hours. You'll remember six of them. ME+A is a personal chief of staff that watches the other 162 — and on Saturday, answers the question with a number it can defend.
Beta · free while it's in beta · scroll to see how
Your calendar has the receipts. Every tool you own can tell you what you finished. Not one of them can tell you whether it was worth finishing.
You set a shape for the season — how much of you goes to career, health, the people you love. Then the week happens. ME+A measures the distance between the two across eight domains, and shows you the gap while you can still do something about it. A deterministic engine does the arithmetic. Nothing here is a vibe.
Performance, Sustainability, Life ROI, Life Capital, Intentionality, Momentum — and a single running number underneath them. Not what you produced. What it was worth.
MEQ — your ME Quotient, one number on a 0–1000 scale for whether the week compounded, not how busy it was.
MEQ moves the way real assets move — slowly, then unmistakably. A strong month nudges it. A strong year moves it a lot. It is deliberately hard to fake.
How MEQ works →One assistant for the whole of your life, built one segment at a time. The scheduler is the segment that exists today — it's also the hardest one, because it's where the evidence comes from. Everything after it inherits the same engine, the same rails, and the same refusal to make a number up.
Plan the week, live it, get it judged. The planning loop, the nightly check-in, the scorecard, MEQ.
Nightly nudge, voice, installed on your home screen. Meeting you where the sixty seconds actually happens.
Things that act, not just observe — with permission and spend scaffolding built before the first agent, not after.
Wearables and passive evidence, so the numbers stop depending on what you remember to report.
“Next” and “Planned” mean not shipped. When something ships, the label comes off — that is the entire rule, and it's audited on every change to this page.
Not a promise about your life. A difference in what you can see.
One thing that must survive each day, a cap of one-three-five — one big thing, three medium, five small — and a real when-and-where for the work that matters. An over-loaded week is flagged before you live it.
Tap it, or just say it. Skip anything you like — it won't assume the worst.
Six scores, what the week cost, and the one thing that got away. Read it, or have it read to you.
Most planners take whatever you type. ME+A grades the plan itself: is there one thing that must survive each day? Is Tuesday carrying eleven hours of “deep” work? Did the big rock get a real when-and-where, or just a wish?
Every screen here is the real product. Every number is real output from the scoring engine on a sample week — labelled as sample, never retouched.
You dropped the plan to firefight a production incident. That isn't a failure to comply — it might have been the best decision you made all week. ME+A judges the deviation on its merits, item by item. When it can't judge one fairly, it says so and scores it zero rather than guess.
Sample week · real engine output · the same seven days
Sample week · the c_burnout archetype, one of eight frozen
fixtures the engine is tested against forever. Every task shipped. Nothing was
left for the person who has to ship next week too.
This is the week every other app celebrates.
The four-burner story says your life runs on four burners — family, friends, health, work — and that to be successful you must switch one off, and to be really successful, two. It's a sharp piece of folk wisdom. It is not a finding, and we won't dress it up as one. ME+A keeps the useful half and refuses the fatalism.
You don't have to turn a burner off. You do have to know what turning one down costs — in a number, every week, while you can still change your mind.
Career · Growth · Health · Relationships · Finance · Fun · Purpose · Environment. Balance measures the distance between how you said this season should go and how it actually went — never against some universal average of a life.
Which means a lopsided season is not a failure. A launch season is supposed to be lopsided. Deliberately turning a burner down is a decision; forgetting you turned it down is the thing that costs you.
Health and Relationships are above zero in every season profile — not by convention, but because the configuration surface is built so that “stop measuring my wellbeing” is unrepresentable. A rail enforced by copy is a suggestion. A rail enforced by the input domain is a rail.
| Domain | Steady | Launch | Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.15 |
| Growth | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.07 |
| Health | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.25 |
| Relationships | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.18 |
| Finance | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Fun | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| Purpose | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.10 |
| Environment | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
The real committed vectors, not an illustration. Each column sums to 1.0. Note what Recovery does: health and fun go up, deep-work volume comes down. It never just lowers every bar — that would be a season that expects less of your life, not more of your recovery. Two more profiles ship alongside these: Family-first and Fundraise.
Balance is 30% of Life Capital, and Life Capital is what feeds the ledger that MEQ is drawn from. So a week spent entirely in one domain doesn't just score badly on a chart you can ignore — it moves the one number the product asks you to care about, and it keeps moving it for as long as the pattern holds.
That's why the burnout week reads the way it does. Every task shipped, so Performance landed at 100. But the effort pointed at one burner, so Life Capital landed at 9 — and MEQ barely moved. The week was productive. Almost none of it compounded.
The eight-domain wheel is a coaching tool, and we grade it Heuristic — there is no peer-reviewed validation of the instrument itself. What is better supported is the reason breadth matters at all: that people need more than one source of competence and connection to stay well (self-determination theory; PERMA). The four-burner framing is folk wisdom and is named as such. Neither gets promoted to science because it makes a better slide.
There are no coins, no badges, no leaderboard. What there is: a number that takes four weeks of signal before it will even show itself, and a handful of moments the product treats as genuinely worth marking.
One missed day a week is bridged quietly. Off-days pause the run rather than break it. There is no buy-back button, because a buy-back button is shame with a price.
Momentum needs two scored weeks. MEQ needs four. A metric that can't be computed honestly shows as locked — it is never estimated to fill a gap.
A 1.6× first-eight-weeks multiplier would have made early progress feel great. It would also have made your number incomparable to your own later self. Declined, permanently.
Every number traces to a deterministic engine — the language model narrates, it never invents a figure. Every scoring decision carries a published row: the choice, the framework, a verified citation, and a grade we don't get to inflate.
Lally, van Jaarsveld, Potts & Wardle (2010). How are habits formed. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998–1009.
ValidatedSonnentag & Fritz (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire. J. Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204–221. · Maslach & Jackson (1981), J. Occupational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113.
ValidatedGollwitzer (1999). Implementation intentions. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.
ValidatedTopp, Østergaard, Søndergaard & Bech (2015). The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 167–176.
ValidatedWheel of Life — a coaching tool with no peer-reviewed validation of the instrument. We say so, on the page and in the map.
HeuristicSplitting non-additive signals across individual tasks — invented precision that would quietly steer real behaviour toward an artefact of the split. And the early-progress multiplier above.
Both are recorded as declined design levers, not omissions.
ME+A does not claim clinical validation. It claims research-grounded components and an instrumented validation program that runs from the first user — WHO-5 and goal progress captured alongside the scores, so the weights answer to evidence instead of taste.
A hole we name is diligence-proof. A hole we hide is not.
How we know →No store links here until there are stores to link to. When something ships, the label comes off — and nothing wears the present tense before it earns it.
This list is the claims ledger's job. Every line marked as existing is re-checked before this page is allowed to change — a stale ledger fails the build.